We urge the ASHA Board of Directors to evaluate the administrative policies and procedures of CAA in consideration of school programs and curriculum development necessary for modern school practice.
Something doesn’t compute!
The BOD represents the only legal authority of ASHA. Specifically, the Bylaws say:
“4.1.2. The Board of Directors is the single governing body of the Association and shall actively promote the objectives of the Association, operating in accordance with and administering and implementing the programs and policies established by these Bylaws and by the Board of Directors. Members of the Board of Directors are elected to serve by and are accountable to the members of the Association.”
The ASHA mission statement includes “setting standards” and “fostering excellence in professional practice…” The CAA is not mentioned.
The Board has full authority to address issues facing CAA:
“4.9.1. The Board of Directors may establish and dissolve standing committees, boards, councils, ad hoc committees, working groups, and other entities necessary to conduct the Association’s business, and designate and change their charges and determine their size, member qualifications, and terms.”
In 2013 the Board voted to approve two CAA members appropriately. It also voted to waive evaluation of CAA, exercising its authority to do so. If it can waive evaluation, it can initiate evaluation.
The ASHA Board of Directors must ignore claims by the CAA to stand alone, as an independent authority. It is responsible to the voting and paying membership via the Board, and half the membership works in schools.
The “autonomy” claim simply does not hold water: In the Bylaws 8.2 this claim is not affirmed:
“The Association, by action of the Board of Directors, shall establish and maintain a program of academic accreditation. The Association shall establish the Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (CAA), which shall define the standards for the accreditation of graduate education programs and apply those standards in the accreditation of such programs…”
Department of Education
The U. S. Department of Education recognizes ASHA for accrediting speech-language pathology and audiology:
“AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION–
Council on Academic Accreditation: Candidate Status”
CAA is the sub-agency of ASHA. The Department of Education recognizes ASHA as the accrediting agency, and the BOD is responsible for ASHA.
CAA is not self-supporting. ASHA members pay for space, personnel and funds to support CAA operations. Such facts do not support the claim of autonomy.
The U. S. Department of Education is presently accepting ASHA’s application for renewal.
“American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology
1967/2010/F2015”