SCHOOL SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY BLOG
CANADA WELCOME
Our purpose is to look into how public policies influence speech-language pathology (SLI) practices in schools. We think it is important for professionals to talk candidly and openly about the ways in which education takes place at the local level. The local level is where the rubber meets the road. It is a reflection both of community norms and federal mandates. This type of knowledge while critical to one’s work is not taught in the college classroom.
We especially welcome your opinions, experiences and expert testimony. For example, SLP burnout is a strong theme running through school employment commentary. A percentage of school SLPs feel isolated and alone with the problem. They need information and support.
It is not possible to view any educational specialty in a vacuum. What happens in schools year-to-year can have more impact on children than the hard work of practicing SLPs and special education teachers. For example, now schools are eliminating positions and this increases caseloads. When SLP caseloads reach 60 children, learning is marginal and stress is high. Plus the child who does not make progress on IEP goals can’t leave special education. FAPE rights are placed in jeopardy, especially for non-disabled minority children.
To understand school practice one must understand the ways in which interconnected federal, state and local agencies enforce congressional mandates. This is far from an exact science. States and local school districts do well under difficult circumstances but some go off on their own and ignore federal requirements. It is like yanking teeth to get them to do the right thing. In the process widespread confusion obtains as to what should be done in ordinary community settings. Rumors spread. One school psychologist said, “Understanding the law is like trying to hit a moving target.”
Non-profit organizations play a role too in shaping policy, as do parent groups. When Congress reauthorizes, they lobby for their positions. For example, out of the blue we have Rose’s Law.
It is clear that agencies and groups can become so narrow in their missions they are almost outside the conversation, talking to themselves.
We are encouraged by the growth experienced and the feedback received.
Let us hear from you!
Dr. John M.Panagos

